/
Community Meeting (October 3, 2018): On Continuing Creativity and What Lies in the Path of the Revolution: Thinking through the hard problems of designing, using, and changing software in practice.
Community Meeting (October 3, 2018): On Continuing Creativity and What Lies in the Path of the Revolution: Thinking through the hard problems of designing, using, and changing software in practice.
Description
Presenters: Colin Clark, Antranig Basman, Philip Tchernavskij
The session will engage you in a conversation about what sort of accessibility attributes we can document in this early design phase. We will work with sample wireframes and develop a common language to use to pass along to developers so that accessibility remains at the forefront of design and implementation.
- http://www.ppig.org/node/1088
- What Lies in the Path of the Revolution paper
- On Continuing Creativity slides
Notes
- PPIG - Psychology of Programming Interest Group
- Founded in 1987 by Thomas Green
- This years conference took place in the Art Guild
- On Computing Creativity
- Inequality is Growing
- 85% of post economic growth by the richest 1%
- 1 of 8 Americans living in poverty
- Tyranny of change
- more than 80% of the cost of software development is devoted to maintenance
- mainly due to the need to evolve in the face of changing requirements
- more than 80% of the cost of software development is devoted to maintenance
- Change is hard for designers
- change has been treated as something that needs to avoid, minimize, control, or managed
- Requirements management methods that focus on getting things right from the start see change as risk
- In agile development teams have autonomy to respond to change. However it's inward looking and a choice that can only be wielded by expert designers and developers. It doesn't extend beyond the circle of trust.
- change has been treated as something that needs to avoid, minimize, control, or managed
- Change is intolerable for users
- for users software tends to be "take it or leave it"
- designers/developers of the software have the power to change it without notice
- Ownership of software
- users don't own it, they just pay to access it
- real ownership should give them power to change
- The failure of models
- people are continually changing, models don't take this into account
- a persona at best is a blur, at worst its a stereotype
- see: The Danger of the single story Ted Talk
- Co-Design and Community
- designing with not simply for
- all participants have equal access to information
- Inequality is Growing
- What Lies in the path of the revolusion
- Analogy that we are the grips of a digital feudalism
- A group that has the power to change the software and large group who doesn't
- Ownable artifacts
- (similar to continuing design above)
- the ability to transplant, substitute, maintain, share, adapt
- function, expression, data, installation, economies
- Things we can't own in practice or in theory
- subscriptions (e.g. creative cloud)
- cloud and web apps (e.g. google docs)
- Analogy that we are the grips of a digital feudalism
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Many More Stories Codesign and Creative Communities
Many More Stories Codesign and Creative Communities
More like this
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2015
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2015
More like this
BEING Futures Co-design Process Reflections
BEING Futures Co-design Process Reflections
More like this
Inclusive Design Education Tools
Inclusive Design Education Tools
More like this
BEING Futures Project
BEING Futures Project
More like this
Inclusive Design, Co-Design, and Co-Creation Resources
Inclusive Design, Co-Design, and Co-Creation Resources
More like this