Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The following are two likely scenarios for implementation:

Scenario 1 - a self-contained metadata editor plugin where the whole user experience is provided "out of the box"

In this case, the user wants access to the metadata authoring and/or editing functionality and is not interested in creating a custom integration. An example would be someone who runs a Wordpress blog and downloads the FLOE Metadata Editor from the plugin repository and starts using it in their blog. Another example might be the case where a user (e.g. a librarian) is using the metadata editor to simply tag media content with its available accessibility features and has no interest in authoring or editing metadata features.

Scenario 2 - a fully customized metadata editor which is integrated into the user's software platform

In this case, the user has a web application already and they want to add elements of the FLOE Metadata Editor to their existing user experience. An example would be someone who maintains an internal CMS and would like to add selected pieces of the FLOE Metadata Editor that are applicable to their context, and possibly also apply their own styling and branding to these elements.

Summary of Discussion:

Possible Designs:

Note: the "bucket" refers to the UI feature (shown here) which holds the existing and recommended metadata features icons for each media item.  See the full designs here.

...