[08:21:25 CST(-0600)] <Justin_o> anastasiac: i merged your pull request for FLUID-4649 into the project repo
[08:21:36 CST(-0600)] <anastasiac> great, thanks Justin_o
[08:44:39 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> hi everyone
[08:44:40 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> 
[08:45:48 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> does any one have any idea about who is working on the google apps module of Atutor?
[08:46:05 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> is greg around?
[08:49:09 CST(-0600)] <jessm> Zifi: groggy would be the one to ask
[08:49:15 CST(-0600)] <jessm> he doesn't seem to be here now
[08:49:39 CST(-0600)] <jessm> oops, greggy. autocorrect is not helping
[08:53:11 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> when does he come online?
[08:53:18 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> do you have any idea?
[08:54:22 CST(-0600)] <jessm> Zifi: not sure – he's usually online by now
[08:54:42 CST(-0600)] <jessm> let me see if i can find him
[08:59:17 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> He's int he ATutor channel at the moment. #atutor
[09:03:56 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> okay..
[09:03:59 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> thanks
[09:04:06 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> I will join that channel..
[09:05:04 CST(-0600)] <greggy> Zifi: ^
[09:05:25 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> Hi
[09:05:35 CST(-0600)] <Zifi> I wanted to talk to you..
[09:05:47 CST(-0600)] <greggy> sure
[09:22:05 CST(-0600)] <jhung> heidiv - got a sec to chat on skype?
[09:22:13 CST(-0600)] <heidiv> jhung yep!
[11:06:42 CST(-0600)] <kasper> Bosmon, colinclark [michelle & yura]: architecture meeting is on
[11:06:47 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> on my way
[11:06:56 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> yura's on vacation
[11:07:01 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> but michelled should be there
[11:19:36 CST(-0600)] <jessm> avtar: i'm munching but ready to talk pre-nebula call whenever you are
[11:34:39 CST(-0600)] <Puneet> hi
[13:38:46 CST(-0600)] <Justin_o> fluid-everyone: would anyone like to join the community meeting remotely?
[13:38:47 CST(-0600)] <Justin_o> we'll be reviewing the changes for jqunit
[13:40:47 CST(-0600)] <jhung> not today Justin_o. Thanks
[13:43:30 CST(-0600)] <Justin_o> jhung: okay.. no problem
[14:22:33 CST(-0600)] <jessm> jhung: can you send me a link to the latest video player roadmap
[14:23:22 CST(-0600)] <jhung> sure gimme a sec
[14:23:50 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jessm: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/FLOE+Video+Player+Development+Planning
[14:24:03 CST(-0600)] <jessm> jhung: danka
[14:24:58 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jessm no prob.
[14:28:48 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jessm, let me know if you have questions.
[14:29:23 CST(-0600)] <jessm> jhung: thanks
[15:08:09 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jvass: I have a question about video player transcript behaviour.
[15:14:04 CST(-0600)] <jvass> jhung: yes?
[15:15:09 CST(-0600)] <jhung> If the transcript panel is open and the video is playing...
[15:15:41 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> colinclark: hey hows it going
[15:15:56 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> do you know of any good documentation on inversion of control… like some power point or something
[15:15:58 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> thealphanerd: good
[15:16:02 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> how about you?
[15:16:09 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> quite well over here
[15:16:12 CST(-0600)] <jhung> What should happen if the user presses up or down arrow on the transcript when the user is at the fold?
[15:16:15 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> ended up with a 4.05 gpa this quarter
[15:16:24 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> and a ton of great work
[15:16:27 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> so I'm quite happy :d
[15:16:37 CST(-0600)] <jhung> Does the focus follow the user's focus, or should focus follow the video progress on the transcript jvass?
[15:18:37 CST(-0600)] <colinclark> thealphanerd: that's awesome! congratulations
[15:20:47 CST(-0600)] <jvass> jhung: i think it should follow the user's focus. similar to if the user start scrolling through the transcript while the video is playing, the transcript should stay where the user scrolled to
[15:21:32 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jvass: great, I think that should be the expected behaviour as well.
[15:21:50 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> thealphanerd - there's this page
[15:21:51 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/docs/How+to+Use+Infusion+IoC
[15:21:57 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> It's probably the clearest we've got now
[15:22:04 CST(-0600)] <jhung> Thanks for the confirmation jvass.
[15:22:20 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> Bosmon: thanks! I was thinking about something that might be a little more framework agnostic
[15:22:24 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> just about the idea of IOC
[15:22:32 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> Well, there's just the Fowler article really
[15:22:34 CST(-0600)] <jvass> though, maybe after a few seconds it should go back to the location of where the video is playing?
[15:22:39 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> I keep talking about it… but still not 100% I understand what it is
[15:22:41 CST(-0600)] <jvass> what do you think, jhung?
[15:22:56 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> fowler article?
[15:23:08 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html?
[15:23:13 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> That one, yes
[15:23:21 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> cool
[15:23:26 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> will read
[15:23:34 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> any of you have experience with static site generation
[15:23:41 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> stuff like jekyll or middleman
[15:23:59 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> I saw people do it using Maven and XSLTs
[15:24:03 CST(-0600)] <Bosmon> Thankfully my experience ended there
[15:24:03 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jvass: I'm not sure. Perhaps the user is reading? Having the view snap back would be problematic. Perhaps we should think of some sort of control that allows the user to jump back to text currently played?
[15:24:19 CST(-0600)] <thealphanerd> lol… was curious if there were any platforms for generating inclusive static sites
[15:25:11 CST(-0600)] <jhung> jvass: currently what you said is happening to a degree. If the user has moved focus elsewhere, once the audio has passed to the next chunk of text, focus snaps back. It feels very jarring.
[15:25:47 CST(-0600)] <jvass> jhung: yeah, i remember before james and i were talking before about some sort of option to snap back to the text being played
[15:26:10 CST(-0600)] <jvass> but it seemed to complicate the interface, and there wasn't a clear way to phrase it