Justin and Michelle say:

> I also like the idea that you have good names for your indexes. (module indexes in the tests).
> > However, I'm only worried about them being hardcoded. The danger is
> > that if even the order of the modules is changed, the tests could fail.
> > What I was thinking was more along the lines of writing a function that
> > will find the index of the module based on its name. This way you won't
> > have to manually keep track of the indexes.

This makes a lot of sense and I completely agree.

AND

I like the idea of putting the data into its own file - I think it
will lead to easier to read code in the builder. The javascript file
containing the data would still need to be located with the demo
rather then with the tests since we wouldn't want the demo to depend
on the tests directory.

Move the script tag into the html and commented out when not in use.