Licensing for fastXmlPull.js
Overview
Fluid Infusion uses portions of a XML SAX parser implemented in JavaScript by the XML For Script project. We have adapted and modified the code from their xmlsax.js file.
This parser was originally released under an LGPL license. We made our modifications available in compliance with the license. However, there is an ambiguity about the compatibility of the ECL 2.0 license and LGPL. As a result, we contacted the maintainer of XML For Script, Dimitry Khudorozhkov to ask if he would be willing to license the parser to us with a clearly compatible license.
Dimitry agreed to license us the parser under the zlib/libpng license. He asked us to go ahead and simply add this license notice to our xmlFastPull.js file.
Record of Communication
From colin.clark@utoronto.ca Tue Apr 21 21:02:35 2009
Message-Id: <8081FAD7-87BE-4999-BB90-6CF149D9685F@utoronto.ca>
From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
To: dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed;
delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Smtp-Server: smtp.utoronto.ca:clarkcol
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:35 -0400
Hi Dimitry,
I'm the technical lead for the Fluid Project, an open community
dedicated helping improve the usability and accessibility of open
source software. http://fluidproject.org/
As part of our Infusion JavaScript application framework, we've built
a client-side template renderer that helps developers render user
interfaces in an unobtrusive style. Information about it is available
here:
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background
I understand that you're the current maintainer of the XML for Script
project. We're using your excellent JavaScript SAX parser as part of
our renderer. Since our implementation doesn't need all the features
of a SAX parser, we are using only the core engine of the parser,
consisting of modified portions of the code in your xmlsax.js file. As
per your LGPL license, we've shared these modifications back under the
original license. You can see the code here in our repository:
Fluid Infusion is dual-licensed under both the BSD and Educational
Community License 2.0. ECL is an Apache-style license used by many
academic open source projects.
Given the FSF and Apache Foundation's ambiguous positions on the
compatibility of the Apache and LGPL licenses, we're concerned that
there may be difficulties with us redistributing our code alongside
LGPL libraries. We really like your library a lot, and would love to
continue using it. Given that copyright holder can grant other
licenses, I'm wondering if you would be willing to share the code in
xmlsax.js with the Fluid community under a BSD or similar license that
would allow us to continue using your libraries without fear of
conflicts.
Let me know if this is something you're willing to consider. And don't
hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help
explain the issue in more detail.
Best regards,
Colin
—
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
From colin.clark@utoronto.ca Tue Apr 21 21:09:50 2009
Message-Id: <B8C7C2B1-37A7-4216-8C31-E3A7652BA393@utoronto.ca>
From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
To: Antranig Basman <antranig@caret.cam.ac.uk>,
Jess Mitchell <jess@jessmitchell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed;
delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Smtp-Server: smtp.utoronto.ca:clarkcol
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Fwd: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:09:50 -0400
References: <8081FAD7-87BE-4999-BB90-6CF149D9685F@utoronto.ca>
Here's my email to the maintainer of the LGPL code we use in the Fluid
Renderer. Keep your fingers crossed that we get a positive response
from him.
Colin
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
> Date: April 21, 2009 9:02:35 PM GMT-04:00
> To: dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com
> Subject: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
>
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> I'm the technical lead for the Fluid Project, an open community
> dedicated helping improve the usability and accessibility of open
> source software. http://fluidproject.org/
>
> As part of our Infusion JavaScript application framework, we've
> built a client-side template renderer that helps developers render
> user interfaces in an unobtrusive style. Information about it is
> available here:
>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background
>
> I understand that you're the current maintainer of the XML for
> Script project. We're using your excellent JavaScript SAX parser as
> part of our renderer. Since our implementation doesn't need all the
> features of a SAX parser, we are using only the core engine of the
> parser, consisting of modified portions of the code in your
> xmlsax.js file. As per your LGPL license, we've shared these
> modifications back under the original license. You can see the code
> here in our repository:
>
> https://source.fluidproject.org/svn/fluid/infusion/trunk/src/webapp/lib/fastXmlPull/js/fastXmlPull.js
>
> Fluid Infusion is dual-licensed under both the BSD and Educational
> Community License 2.0. ECL is an Apache-style license used by many
> academic open source projects.
>
> Given the FSF and Apache Foundation's ambiguous positions on the
> compatibility of the Apache and LGPL licenses, we're concerned that
> there may be difficulties with us redistributing our code alongside
> LGPL libraries. We really like your library a lot, and would love to
> continue using it. Given that copyright holder can grant other
> licenses, I'm wondering if you would be willing to share the code in
> xmlsax.js with the Fluid community under a BSD or similar license
> that would allow us to continue using your libraries without fear of
> conflicts.
>
> Let me know if this is something you're willing to consider. And
> don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, or if I can
> help explain the issue in more detail.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Colin
>
> —
> Colin Clark
> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
> http://fluidproject.org
>
—
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
From dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com Thu Apr 23 03:45:52 2009
Return-Path: <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
Received: via tmail-2006f.17+utssl for clarkcol; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:45:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bureau15.ns.utoronto.ca (128.100.132.43:9619 "EHLO
bureau15.ns.utoronto.ca") by bureau17.ns.utoronto.ca with ESMTP
id <S1109206AbZDWHpq>; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:45:46 -0400
Received: from bureau56.ns.utoronto.ca (128.100.132.143:5310 "EHLO
bureau56.ns.utoronto.ca") by bureau15.ns.utoronto.ca with ESMTP
id S1079859AbZDWHp3 (ORCPT <rfc822;colin.clark@utoronto.ca>);
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:45:29 -0400
Received: from web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com 216.252.110.68)
by bureau56.ns.utoronto.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n3N7jSku032164
for <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:45:29 -0400
Received: (qmail 26334 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2009 07:45:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1240472728; bh=bxTFaEjI5DwVCsi9NgPKfwi2Mtq1juzhW5wCEjnwKgE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Yp5DulXmB+Kd4iMmOpjbjXb4ootuyBst5ZIWfYwQ0yFkzNKScxmiHN4O8iJEr2z2399zOcjzgx/npEmteiEju+g2/tb8R4Ph5W4+dTUWEv6/hI/tCyNTZew6MpvzJsx4QmzXQyQzyuEwKyn1kXuvveRYyq63xzWI7I7uxt18RSw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=uBaoFqxjdD8FGNC9vvC7PnBbX0CpGx5/pEpYqrq/DPpXJj8YkO1hRNQUcNR/QS4BASa1WqTQoZoxpqu8U6TYeN01qCFwVTFCj9oHvYye+x9yCq+sF06njcwcGbvJAcTh3YEPuuOnIGbHMHd4Q4uBzTh7e74XO3J9W8sLz2UJ/wo=;
Message-ID: <177636.23871.qm@web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: LVCs_KwVM1moISDIFE06i_o9xXmAwyjo1O4Af68Xg_x4LRlhJM03AfQms7SFOqgVeJ1pCt_2ISblN7ajnWWnIxxfPM2llPMbNgjWb11xNY9jS0p960W2QGXQIGPtJJx0XDiV0TFiH6k3hDIyOaQP3_bHNMwzvN66KBOJofhg1NEMgHg305O319nEW_HuljufsB0G0DDVaMmumFNBB8qQ2eMwb4fO57i6RTy96xUkWenpuv6ItDTRipNoN3ceasx4I138vZ5wpR6xFIBPzL9Gew--
Received: from 62.117.85.84 by web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:45:28 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dmitry Khudorozhkov <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
To: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1447857775-1240472728=:23871"
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2009.4.23.73500
--0-1447857775-1240472728=:23871
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Colin,
is it a good idea if I double-license the parser you need with both LGPL and zlib/libpng?
- Dmitry.
— On Wed, 4/22/09, Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca> wrote:
From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
Subject: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
To: dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 5:02 AM
Hi Dimitry,
I'm the technical lead for the Fluid Project, an open community dedicated helping improve the usability and accessibility of open source software. http://fluidproject.org/
As part of our Infusion JavaScript application framework, we've built a client-side template renderer that helps developers render user interfaces in an unobtrusive style. Information about it is available here:
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background
I understand that you're the current maintainer of the XML for Script project. We're using your excellent JavaScript SAX parser as part of our renderer. Since our implementation doesn't need all the features of a SAX parser, we are using only the core engine of the parser, consisting of modified portions of the code in your xmlsax.js file. As per your LGPL license, we've shared these modifications back under the original license. You can see the code here in our repository:
Fluid Infusion is dual-licensed under both the BSD and Educational Community License 2.0. ECL is an Apache-style license used by many academic open source projects.
Given the FSF and Apache Foundation's ambiguous positions on the compatibility of the Apache and LGPL licenses, we're concerned that there may be difficulties with us redistributing our code alongside LGPL libraries. We really like your library a lot, and would love to continue using it. Given that copyright holder can grant other licenses, I'm wondering if you would be willing to share the code in xmlsax.js with the Fluid community under a BSD or similar license that would allow us to continue using your libraries without fear of conflicts.
Let me know if this is something you're willing to consider. And don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help explain the issue in more detail.
Best regards,
Colin
—
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
Want To Make your Email happier !?!?!
--0-1447857775-1240472728=:23871
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Hi Colin,<br><br>is it a good idea if I double-license the parser you need with both LGPL and zlib/libpng?<br><br>- Dmitry.<br><br>--- On <b>Wed, 4/22/09, Colin Clark <i><colin.clark@utoronto.ca></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca><br>Subject: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project<br>To: dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com<br>Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 5:02 AM<br><br><div class="plainMail">Hi Dimitry,<br><br>I'm the technical lead for the Fluid Project, an open community dedicated helping improve the usability and accessibility of open source software. <a href="http://fluidproject.org/" target="_blank">http://fluidproject.org/</a><br><br>As part of our Infusion JavaScript application framework, we've built a
client-side template renderer that helps developers render user interfaces in an unobtrusive style. Information about it is available here:<br><br><a href="http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer" target="_blank">http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer</a><br><a href="http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background" target="_blank">http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background</a><br><br>I understand that you're the current maintainer of the XML for Script project. We're using your excellent JavaScript SAX parser as part of our renderer. Since our implementation doesn't need all the features of a SAX parser, we are using only the core engine of the parser, consisting of modified portions of the code in your xmlsax.js file. As per your LGPL license, we've shared these modifications back under the original license. You can see the code here in our repository:<br><br><a
href="https://source.fluidproject.org/svn/fluid/infusion/trunk/src/webapp/lib/fastXmlPull/js/fastXmlPull.js" target="_blank">https://source.fluidproject.org/svn/fluid/infusion/trunk/src/webapp/lib/fastXmlPull/js/fastXmlPull.js</a><br><br>Fluid Infusion is dual-licensed under both the BSD and Educational Community License 2.0. ECL is an Apache-style license used by many academic open source projects.<br><br>Given the FSF and Apache Foundation's ambiguous positions on the compatibility of the Apache and LGPL licenses, we're concerned that there may be difficulties with us redistributing our code alongside LGPL libraries. We really like your library a lot, and would love to continue using it. Given that copyright holder can grant other licenses, I'm wondering if you would be willing to share the code in xmlsax.js with the Fluid community under a BSD or similar license that would allow us to continue using your libraries without fear of
conflicts.<br><br>Let me know if this is something you're willing to consider. And don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help explain the issue in more detail.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Colin<br><br>---<br>Colin Clark<br>Technical Lead, Fluid Project<br>Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto<br><a href="http://fluidproject.org" target="_blank">http://fluidproject.org</a><br><br></div></blockquote><br><br><br><br><br><hr />Want To Make your Email happier !?!?! <a href="http://smileystoolbar.net"><img src="http://smileystoolbar.net/smiley/signaturesmiley/79151175/click_here_07_ba.gif"></img></a>
</td></tr></table><br>
--0-1447857775-1240472728=:23871--
From colin.clark@utoronto.ca Tue Apr 28 17:58:26 2009
Message-Id: <72C266AB-E16D-4787-A8FF-84D46D0777FE@utoronto.ca>
From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
To: Dmitry Khudorozhkov <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <177636.23871.qm@web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed;
delsp=yes
X-Smtp-Server: smtp.utoronto.ca:clarkcol
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:58:26 -0400
References: <177636.23871.qm@web55907.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Dimitry,
Thanks so much for your response. zlib/libpng looks just fine, and I
really appreciate your willingness to accommodate our project.
Do you want to send me a copy of the zlib/libpng version of your
license header for the file, or should I simply add it in alongside
the LGPL license currently in xmlsax.js?
Colin
On 23-Apr-09, at 3:45 AM, Dmitry Khudorozhkov wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> is it a good idea if I double-license the parser you need with both
> LGPL and zlib/libpng?
>
> - Dmitry.
>
> — On Wed, 4/22/09, Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
> Subject: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
> To: dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 5:02 AM
>
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> I'm the technical lead for the Fluid Project, an open community
> dedicated helping improve the usability and accessibility of open
> source software. http://fluidproject.org/
>
> As part of our Infusion JavaScript application framework, we've
> built a client-side template renderer that helps developers render
> user interfaces in an unobtrusive style. Information about it is
> available here:
>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Renderer
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Fluid+Renderer+-+Background
>
> I understand that you're the current maintainer of the XML for
> Script project. We're using your excellent JavaScript SAX parser as
> part of our renderer. Since our implementation doesn't need all the
> features of a SAX parser, we are using only the core engine of the
> parser, consisting of modified portions of the code in your
> xmlsax.js file. As per your LGPL license, we've shared these
> modifications back under the original license. You can see the code
> here in our repository:
>
> https://source.fluidproject.org/svn/fluid/infusion/trunk/src/webapp/lib/fastXmlPull/js/fastXmlPull.js
>
> Fluid Infusion is dual-licensed under both the BSD and Educational
> Community License 2.0. ECL is an Apache-style license used by many
> academic open source projects.
>
> Given the FSF and Apache Foundation's ambiguous positions on the
> compatibility of the Apache and LGPL licenses, we're concerned that
> there may be difficulties with us redistributing our code alongside
> LGPL libraries. We really like your library a lot, and would love to
> continue using it. Given that copyright holder can grant other
> licenses, I'm wondering if you would be willing to share the code in
> xmlsax.js with the Fluid community under a BSD or similar license
> that would allow us to continue using your libraries without fear of
> conflicts.
>
> Let me know if this is something you're willing to consider. And
> don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, or if I can
> help explain the issue in more detail.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Colin
>
> —
> Colin Clark
> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
> http://fluidproject.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Want To Make your Email happier !?!?!
>
—
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
From dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com Tue Apr 28 18:14:55 2009
Return-Path: <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
Received: via tmail-2006f.17+utssl for clarkcol; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bureau16.ns.utoronto.ca (128.100.132.44:31127 "EHLO
bureau16.ns.utoronto.ca") by bureau17.ns.utoronto.ca with ESMTP
id <S1086381AbZD1WOr>; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:14:47 -0400
Received: from bureau21.ns.utoronto.ca (128.100.132.55:63448 "EHLO
bureau21.ns.utoronto.ca") by bureau16.ns.utoronto.ca with ESMTP
id S1095767AbZD1WOn (ORCPT <rfc822;colin.clark@utoronto.ca>);
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:14:43 -0400
Received: from web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com 216.252.110.62)
by bureau21.ns.utoronto.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n3SMEglA016625
for <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:14:42 -0400
Received: (qmail 89731 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2009 22:14:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1240956882; bh=FY5TPacT4Yhha1LlVBmO72Y4koEmtGEf44HHdO4Q6ew=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CnL9irZ2oIyzWlOpubIlvpj0aDyjScM0rqA9retKjC8qbcxR7+BRj+USFB3O6b/AokhfJ1f5zW7KlH4WBM+9UDgxy4ivZ35MGVLClcvWJbiRONrx3UGg4lyPY1xGv6kY2LeAsLPM6rDUKEr6Ir71cvbULx3yxIR31FIXqDrqwSU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=m3/TyIO7ougDWm5PBN9nPoQXxh+GyEh++2wZrn3V9Cu0haQqEHuNC+JuZha7fwLXAznp/EVJ/HuvwmCSeLsnDYpSfdr4I25IfKm9NsWeetRyazGwH5EF/fZrbteMAJsPZX3uNoR56ujBDRnbu4yB0vhWvXMuk1syEAFLVEIOVDI=;
Message-ID: <215534.89459.qm@web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: unfv.ssVM1k5sO89YkHhIWR1hI_Jdn4qoiM5ArcWw5tNS8PKPiwPoJJnVIeCyT5a3cx0qToUiASZOOY_qonQhXRQyDYV8OjGSSfe4o6vZAyof6UkYg48.oterWTxUv7NQEnttXVWEaQeNdE2GNbcU.WmeL.PrTYuluLB3Kdo1eW4k2MLKC7khLHVVNEjbYSZQi_iTGlUfpzKAIPqJQxLuQMamhMRGe0uFD9RwstijlsT0SNEKLwqc7NLl3fgtXS_ZENusmHBfPvfmvj6xhRUQw--
Received: from 62.117.85.106 by web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:14:41 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dmitry Khudorozhkov <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
To: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1492867615-1240956881=:89459"
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2009.4.28.220444
--0-1492867615-1240956881=:89459
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Colin,
> Do you want to send me a copy of the zlib/libpng version of your
license header for
> the file, or should I simply add it in alongside the
LGPL license currently in xmlsax.js?
Just add it right after LGPL.
Regards,
Dmitry.
--0-1492867615-1240956881=:89459
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Hi Colin,<br><br>> Do you want to send me a copy of the zlib/libpng version of your
license header for<br>> the file, or should I simply add it in alongside the
LGPL license currently in xmlsax.js?<br><br>Just add it right after LGPL.<br><br>Regards,<br>Dmitry.<br></td></tr></table><br>
--0-1492867615-1240956881=:89459--
From colin.clark@utoronto.ca Tue Apr 28 18:19:05 2009
Message-Id: <66EB62C4-60A8-4523-83C3-9653E4BC7360@utoronto.ca>
From: Colin Clark <colin.clark@utoronto.ca>
To: Dmitry Khudorozhkov <dmitrykhudorozhkov@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <215534.89459.qm@web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed;
delsp=yes
X-Smtp-Server: smtp.utoronto.ca:clarkcol
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Licensing XML for Script and the Fluid Project
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:19:05 -0400
References: <215534.89459.qm@web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Thanks again, Dimitry. I really appreciate it.
On 28-Apr-09, at 6:14 PM, Dmitry Khudorozhkov wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> > Do you want to send me a copy of the zlib/libpng version of your
> license header for
> > the file, or should I simply add it in alongside the LGPL license
> currently in xmlsax.js?
>
> Just add it right after LGPL.
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry.
>
—
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org