fluid-work IRC Logs-2013-06-21

[07:19:35 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: hi, good morning. I'm not sure if you saw this, but i left a comment on your pull request yesterday

[07:37:20 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> yep I saw that Justin_o. I'm fine with that.

[07:39:27 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Justin_o: I left a comment on http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4996 - what do you think of my proposed solution?

[07:41:33 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: the idea sounds reasonable. Part of the current interaction is to hide it when you are in the edit mode, so we'll have to make sure that is still possible

[07:43:28 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Justin_o: I wonder if this will require a quick wireframe / spec outlining the behaviour of the edit icon? This is new functionality in a way...

[07:47:09 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: hmm possibly.. i'm not sure what design resources we currently have detailing the interaction for it

[07:49:05 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Justin_o: I was thinking maybe just a point-form list just so we know what's supposed to happen. (i.e. if the edit icon appears outside the text field, then it should appear dimmed and not disappear).

[07:49:44 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: sure

[07:50:05 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> I guess I've volunteered to do that.

[07:50:31 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: haha.. yes.. i think so

[07:52:40 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Alright. I'll get to that this morning. Then I'm off to do the image conversion for FSS.

[07:53:02 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: cool.. also can you make that change to your pull request and i'll review and get it in

[07:58:54 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> cindyli: i'm thinking of this for the update to our schema http://pastie.org/8066377

[07:59:34 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> i still have to add a few more in, but those should be the same as before

[07:59:44 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> it looks good, Justin_o

[08:00:51 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> sure Justin_o

[10:13:32 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Justin_o: I've added a comment here re: inline edit icon http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4996#comment-23676

[10:13:46 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - by default the edit icon appears immediately to the right of the editable text field.

[10:13:46 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - edit mode can be activated by selecting the icon or by selecting the text field.

[10:13:46 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - the edit icon by default dims when edit field is activated

[10:13:46 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - hovering over the edit icon will produce an outline

[10:13:47 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Using CSS, the user will be able to:

[10:13:47 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - position the edit icon to where ever they want

[10:13:48 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> - modify dim style or hide the icon all together when edit mode is activated

[10:24:08 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: sounds good

[10:52:51 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> cindyli: what do you think of this http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Schema+for+UIO+preferences

[10:53:11 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> maybe we should remove the "format" property from the Captions Language? what do you think?

[11:10:50 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> anastasiac: you might be interested in this, in terms of the new UIO api proposal

[11:10:51 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4907

[11:11:10 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> it's an example of how we might use the builder with uio.. and suggests an api for them

[11:48:27 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> heidiv: ping

[11:48:32 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> jhung howdy!

[11:48:42 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> got a question for you.

[11:48:46 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> shoot

[11:50:08 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Different FSS themes have exclusive images (i.e. android and ios themes have special back buttons). Separate fonts be created for these themes, correct or should FSS have only 1 font for all themes?

[12:03:15 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Justin_o: ah there you are. I was asking heidiv this, but wondering if you had any thoughts?

[12:03:19 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> Different FSS themes have exclusive images (i.e. android and ios themes have special back buttons). Separate fonts be created for these themes, correct or should FSS have only 1 font for all themes?

[12:04:11 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> jhung i would lean toward per-theme. i feel like some FSS stuff w images is dated and can be replaced by straight css

[12:04:19 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> jhung: that's an interesting question and might depend on what we think the future of FSS is

[12:04:26 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> meaning are we going to be adding more themes

[12:04:46 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> if so we might want things to be more modular as we won't want to be updating the font file all the time, but if not.. then a single file might be easier to use

[12:04:56 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> colinclark: do you have any thoughts on FSS

[12:05:37 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> heidiv: that's a good point too… as long as those updates work across our supported browsers that would be a better approach that carrying around the images

[12:06:10 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> for ex. i think fss has images for "the left side of a button" and the "right side of a button" … now i'm guessing we'd just want css styling.

[12:06:25 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> v.s make the left side of a button a font icon

[12:06:35 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> jhung am i right about that being in FSS?

[12:06:39 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> yep

[12:06:48 CDT(-0500)] <heidiv> yeah… any other stuff like that in there?

[12:07:02 CDT(-0500)] <heid