fluid-tech IRC Logs-2012-10-19
[15:42:34 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> JURA has just presented his awesome first draft of DECLARATIVELY ENCODED DEMANDS BLOCKS
[15:42:40 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> http://pastie.org/5085903
[15:42:55 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I am suggesting that the "demands" section probably needs to be an array, disagreeable though such things often are
[15:43:15 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Since you can't guarantee that there will not be more than one demands block issued against the same name
[15:43:34 CDT(-0500)] <yura> but it should be fine
[15:43:37 CDT(-0500)] <yura> if you look at the block
[15:43:42 CDT(-0500)] <yura> there are 2 demands blocks for the same name
[15:44:00 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I'd also prefer to see a more JSON-like encoding of the "contexts" value
[15:44:31 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Well yes, there are now with your "all contexts in one string" methodology : P
[15:47:30 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> colinclark - any views?
[15:47:41 CDT(-0500)] <yura> so howw would you encode it
[15:52:10 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Something like this?
[15:52:11 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> http://pastie.org/5085953