/
SJRK Face to Face Meeting - Toronto, Oct 17, 2019
SJRK Face to Face Meeting - Toronto, Oct 17, 2019
Project Retrospective
What went well
- Systemic changes at TiG around thinking about accessibility and doing audits of the work.
- Regular meetings helped in order to get feedback on how projects were going.
- Bringing together youth at the margins of society.
- Diverse inclusion.
- Capacity building.
- Openness and flexibility of the project.
- Ability to explore.
- Each of the partners brought parts of what they were working on and what they knew and enhanced it through the project.
- Diverse products were generated.
- Connecting with community and seeing the impact in people’s lives.
- Co-designing with young people - inclusion by design
What didn’t go well
- At the beginning it was difficult to understand - what we were doing and how
- Challenge in visualizing all the products that were generated and share them
- Couldn’t make people feel ownership of the tool (wikipedia). Only a few teachers were interested. Even with a dedicated person working with them
- Difficult to change habits
- We didn’t get the content translated
What can we do differently
- Shared metrics or performance indicators. Setup and agreed to at the beginning of the project. How many people? How many events? How many stories did we collect?
- Find a way of having the youth take on the mentorship of the things that we helped to initiate.
- Clarity around budgets and plans from the beginning
- Instead of formal report, report in a way that can be put on the website to be generally shared
- Website design work could have started sooner
- Simplified website - more adaptability, more alternatives
- Figure out translation for the website early
- Meeting in different places would be nice
- Getting the youth from different places together to share their experiences
- Create more practical guides for people to enact inclusion - making ramps, accommodations etc.
- Create more collaborative resources together among the partners. Making sure one groups website is inclusive of other groups - language, context etc.
- Translation is paramount in this type of project and will allow for more cross pollination between partner groups.
- More brainstorming between groups instead of so much independent work.
- Use more social media
- Bringing young people into regular meetings and a co-design process.
- Budgeting translation and accessibility services from the beginning.
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2019
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2019
More like this
Young People
Young People
More like this
Co-planning the Community Input Activity
Co-planning the Community Input Activity
More like this
Community workshops and design crits
Community workshops and design crits
More like this
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2021
Community Workshop and Design Crit Topics from 2021
More like this
Consultation, research, and compensation
Consultation, research, and compensation
More like this