Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Hi,
I have been pretty out of the loop due to school, but I went to a National Gallery of Canada conference this Friday & Saturday entitled "Collections, Connections, Communities: Making Museums and Galleries in Canada inclusive and accessible".
This was an interesting conference. The one setback was a travel disruption that make me miss the morning Friday. A notable thing about the conference was the effort that went into accessibility. When I registered I filled out a form that asked if I wanted an ASL translator, the format I required my conference materials in, whether I was English or French. I was impressed from the outset at this effort to personalize the experience.
Exhibition design for Access: A universal design approach
- this presentation was quite critical of the "one size fits all" aspect of universal design. it emphasized the importance of universal design as a baseline, and going beyond this by doing consultation with community stakeholders and by doing user testing.
- Brian Casey, an education specialist at the Canada Science and Technology Museum in Ottawa, gave an overview of the museum's "Braille: Knowledge at your Fingertips" exhibition. (more info about the exhibition is here: http://www.sciencetech.technomuses.ca/english/whatson/tempexhibits.cfm#braille). This was a partnership between the museum and the CNIB.
- the presenters gave an overview of exhibition design concepts to keep in mind regarding inclusion, which I think are quite relevant for Engage (and perhaps especially for our DIA kiosk designs). We could potentially work with this checklist as we work with the DIA's exhibition designers (or whoever will be in charge of the placement of the kiosk). Of course, a lot of these factors they take care of because they have to work with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
1. start with physical access, keeping in mind:
a) circulation - can traffic (esp. wheelchair users, people w/ service dogs) move around the artifact or display?
b) is the furniture height appropriate?
c) is there knee clearance underneath?
2. Visibility
a) viewing angles
b) lighting levels
c) barriers to visibility?
3. Protection & Security
a) is the collection secure?
b) conservation requirements taken care of?
c) staff & visitor safety
4) Information treatment
a) visual communication
b) attraction
c) text size & contrast
5) Check in
consultation with stakeholder communities & user testing should occur iteratively along points 1-5.

  • No labels