Completed January 2009 by Erin Yu, Allison Bloodworth, Daphne Ogle & Judy Stern SummaryHigh-level summary to be added after testing has been completed. NotesWe plan to focus our testing on the time picker this time around, since we got positive feedback on the date picker in Round 1. Goals Excerpt |
---|
The test should discover: - Can users figure out how to close or move the date & time pickers?
- Do users understand the meaning of the colors on the date picker?
- Do users recognize the grouping of options (hours, minutes, am/pm) in the time picker?
- (for the combined date-time field with tabbed picker) Do users understand the tab metaphor and that they can go back and forth between them when needed?
- Do users use the mouse to select them, or type in dates and times?
- Do users comment on what good defaults might be?
|
Success CriteriaA successful design has been achieved when: ProtocolMethod and test coordinator script. UsersSince the date picker will be used by a wide variety of users, we will attempt to do testing with students, faculty and staff. We attempted to recruit variety of users with ranging technical skills, gender, and age. Interaction DesignUnderlying design patterns and description of component behavior. Most of the screens in the paper prototype below are shown in the storyboards: Test EnvironmentLocation and version of the environment that was used. Attach a screenshot of the environment at the time of testing if the environment will change over time. ResultsFull notes and analysis of the user tests. Insert excerpt |
---|
| Date Time Picker Paper Prototype User Testing - Round 2 Results |
---|
nopanel | true |
---|
| Date Time Picker Paper Prototype User Testing - Round 2 Results |
---|
nopanel | true |
---|
|
More... |