...
[14:17:36 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Actually, what would you want "args" to do in this case?
[14:17:43 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I guess some boiling
[14:17:48 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> exactly
[14:18:01 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> What in particular do you want to boil into the signature?
[14:18:06 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> and "expectedResult", "testType"
[14:18:20 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> aha
[14:18:29 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Yes, it seems this isn't implemented
[14:18:33 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Would you like to implement it? : P
[14:18:54 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> sure
[14:19:35 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I'll be happy to review your pull 
[14:19:35 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> a bit scary to modify framework code but you will review it anyway
[14:19:54 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Well, I think it's time for people to stop being scared
[14:20:04 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> will give a try
[14:20:30 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> It should only take an "if" statement and a call to fluid.expandOptions...
[14:20:41 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Actually my latest pull request with declarative change binding contains a good example of how to do this
[14:20:50 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> The current framework code for event boiling is very convoluted
[14:20:50 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> ah ha
[14:20:57 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But the change binding pull takes a much more direct approach
[16:01:44 CDT(-0500)] <yzen_> Bosmon: hi