...
[12:19:14 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> anastasiac - the language transformation is the only non-trivial part....
[12:19:55 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> I'm trying to modify the UIO modelRelay to support this
[12:20:15 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> I've set the mergePolicy on the rules to noExpand to be able to handle the function name
[12:20:42 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> but that means any IoC reference the video player or its options or model would be expanded
[12:21:02 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Reading between the lines, I'm hearing Bosmon saying that it's a pretty tough problem, this one
[12:21:13 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> anastasiac - in fact, the "modelRelay" system inside the VideoPlayer was our current best attempt at this problem
[12:21:35 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> So if there were any modifications to be done, it would be to transfer that implementation to UIO, rather than the other way round
[12:21:59 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> ok, so modify the UIO modelRelay to work the way the VP-private one did
[12:22:02 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But I don't believe we have enough framework infrastructure or planning to be able to tackle this problem properly yet
[12:22:12 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Which is why we currently left the VideoPlayer relay where it was
[12:22:25 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> If it had been "framework-ready", we would have put it in the framework already
[12:22:35 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> well, the VP relay was there before UIO had its own relay, I belie e
[12:22:43 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> anastasiac - that's correct
[12:22:53 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> I was hoping that the relay created for UIO might be sufficient
[12:23:04 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Neither the VP relay nor the UIO relay are good enough to become a standard part of the framework
[12:23:12 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Which is why they are currently separate, private implementations
[12:23:30 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But of the two of these, the VP one is more capable and has had more thought applied to it
[12:23:33 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> do you think it might be worth updating the UIO relay to offer what the VP relay currently does?
[12:23:50 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> anastasiac - not without a big conversation, no
[12:24:16 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> ok, we'll leave it where it is, then
[12:24:21 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> We would need to get all the Model Transformation team involved, including you, colin, Kasper, etc.
[12:24:31 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Since this is one of the next big upgrades for Model Transformations
[12:24:38 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I'd prefer to have time for kasper to get his branch in first
[12:24:45 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Since this will fundamentally affect a few aspects of MT
[12:24:47 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> right, he's been making mods
[12:25:03 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> And he has another big change coming up, which will change the meaning of MT in a fairly fundamental way
[12:25:27 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Unfortunately he has been distracted with the pilots for a while, but once they are over, hopefully we can get his stuff up to speed
[12:25:39 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> kasper, I think, is going a little nuts with the pilots
[12:25:52 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> and fascinatingly, some of their difficulty revolves around weaknesses in model transformation
[12:25:58 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> he was telling me today that he was keen to get back to it