...
[10:25:23 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> thanks
[10:30:13 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Justin_o: I've had some trouble reviewing Bosmon's fix for http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5172 because of a lot of failures in IE 8
[10:30:22 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> And maybe I'm just doing something dumb
[10:30:45 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> colinclark: did you want me to try it out on my IE8 vm?
[10:30:49 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Certainly, without his fix, I get many more failures
[10:30:58 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> progress
[10:31:06 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark>
[10:31:34 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> I guess I'd be curious to hear what results you get, if it's not terribly inconvenient
[10:31:46 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Right now I'm actually testing with a fresh Windows 7 and IE8
[10:32:44 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> sure i'll take a look at it after standup
[11:11:29 CDT(-0500)] <clown> yzen: is there an c4a architecture gotomeeting today?
[11:11:40 CDT(-0500)] <clown> did I miss that memo?
[11:11:44 CDT(-0500)] <yzen> i thnk they changed the time
[11:11:47 CDT(-0500)] <yzen> 1h
[11:11:53 CDT(-0500)] <clown> 1pm?
[11:11:57 CDT(-0500)] <clown> okay, thanks.
[13:29:10 CDT(-0500)] <jhung> jessm: here's the wiki page comparing various CSS frameworks. http://wiki.fluidproject.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=37850771
[13:45:59 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> fluid-everyone: would anyone like to join the community meeting remotely? we'll be talking about api changes since 1.4
[13:46:27 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> me, Justin_o
[13:46:49 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> cindyli: okay.. i'll add you
[13:47:02 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> cindyli: by the way, anastasiac found a few more major issues with the composite panel ;(
[13:47:12 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> Justin_o, I've added those three JIRAs to the iteration page. As soon as I push my branch, I'll add links to it to the JIRAs
[13:47:14 CDT(-0500)] <cindyli> oh, nooooo.....
[13:47:18 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> sorry...
[13:49:25 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Justin_o: I think you're going to like this ChangeApplier pull request I am reviewing, if you're not already using it
[13:49:31 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> it's a nice improvement
[13:53:06 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> colinclark: haven't yet, but i'm assuming it's the declarative syntax one, and i am looking forward to that
[13:53:14 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> yup, that's the one
[13:53:21 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> sorry i've been so slow with it, but it's a good change
[13:55:43 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> colinclark: np thanks for looking at it
[13:57:00 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Hi Justin_o
[13:57:03 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Do add me
[13:57:11 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> Bosmon: okay.. will do
[13:57:37 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> Bosmon: by the way, i'll probably need your help with a few issues anastasiac has found with the composite panels
[14:01:36 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Deprecations+in+1.5
[16:26:42 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Bosmon: What is "noThis" used for in the apply function you return from fluid.changeToApplicable()?
[16:26:43 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/pull/417/files#diff-50cd32a7983e921376821a0476122713R1399
[16:27:45 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> colinclark - it is used to conform the signature of the "returned thing" to the standard one for Function.apply
[16:27:58 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> ah, yes
[16:28:02 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> you're making an apply-like thing
[16:28:11 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> An.... "applicable" : P
[16:28:13 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> or rather, a function-like thing
[16:28:14 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> yes
[16:28:15 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> ok
[16:28:16 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> I get it
[16:33:02 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> you need more farm.cats in your test cases, Bosmon
[16:33:08 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon>
[16:33:28 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Rather than "things"? : P
[16:33:45 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> nests of things
[16:33:57 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> I suppose it's a lot easier to keep track
[16:36:29 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> It's really odd that Git found conflicts in this merge
[16:36:33 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> since it's pretty clear to me what changed
[16:36:40 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> They are probably in the five-star demo
[16:36:41 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> ?
[16:36:50 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> yep
[16:37:06 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> two very obvious ones
[16:37:08 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> There was still a "diamond change"
[16:37:20 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> So it could never have been certain that the other changes were not required
[16:38:17 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> a "diamond change?"
[16:38:30 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> There were two separate changes along different paths to the parent revision
[16:38:48 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Along one, "dynamic: true" was added, and along another, the entire block was removed and replaced with the declarative binding...
[22:03:43 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> hey yzen
[22:03:53 CDT(-0500)] <yzen> colinclark: hi
[22:03:57 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> what's your best real-world example of dynamic grades?
[22:04:02 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> rock me
[22:04:25 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Bosmon was entertaining my 18th century sensibilities
[22:04:48 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> trying to explain them to me
[22:15:56 CDT(-0500)] <yzen> colinclark, I have never actually used them yet and was going to look at flocking for the reference
[22:20:27 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> yzen - funny
[22:21:45 CDT(-0500)] <yzen>